4.7 Article

Methamphetamine causes microglial activation in the brains of human abusers

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 28, 期 22, 页码 5756-5761

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1179-08.2008

关键词

methamphetamine; addiction; neurotoxicity; microglia; positron emission tomography; human

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methamphetamine is a popular addictive drug whose use is associated with multiple neuropsychiatric adverse events and toxic to the dopaminergic and serotonergic systems of the brain. Methamphetamine-induced neuropathology is associated with increased expression of microglial cells that are thought to participate in either pro-toxic or protective mechanisms in the brain. Although reactive microgliosis has been observed in animal models of methamphetamine neurotoxicity, no study has reported on the status of microglial activation in human methamphetamine abusers. The present study reports on 12 abstinent methamphetamine abusers and 12 age-, gender-, and education-matched control subjects who underwent positron emission tomography using a radiotracer for activated microglia, [C-11](R)-(1-[ 2-chlorophenyl]-N-methyl-N-[ 1-methylpropyl]-3-isoquinoline carboxamide) ([C-11](R)-PK11195). Compartment analysis was used to estimate quantitative levels of binding potentials of [C-11](R)-PK11195 in brain regions with dopaminergic and/ or serotonergic innervation. The mean levels of [C-11](R)-PK11195 binding were higher in methamphetamine abusers than those in control subjects in all brain regions (> 250% higher; p < 0.01 for all). In addition, the binding levels in the midbrain, striatum, thalamus, and orbitofrontal and insular cortices (p < 0.05) correlated inversely with the duration of methamphetamine abstinence. These results suggest that chronic self-administration of methamphetamine can cause reactive microgliosis in the brains of human methamphetamine abusers, a level of activation that appears to subside over longer periods of abstinence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据