4.7 Article

Postnatal Differentiation of Basket Cells from Slow to Fast Signaling Devices

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 28, 期 48, 页码 12956-12968

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2890-08.2008

关键词

GABAergic neuron; development; dentate gyrus; basket cell; gamma; network

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [505/C6, SFB 780/A5]
  2. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [OI GQ 0420]
  3. Volkswagenstiftung [I/78563-564]
  4. Royal Society
  5. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gamma frequency (30-100 Hz) oscillations in the mature cortex underlie higher cognitive functions. Fast signaling in GABAergic interneuron networks plays a key role in the generation of these oscillations. During development of the rodent brain, gamma activity appears at the end of the first postnatal week, but frequency and synchrony reach adult levels only by the fourth week. However, the mechanisms underlying the maturation of gamma activity are unclear. Here we demonstrate that hippocampal basket cells (BCs), the proposed cellular substrate of gamma oscillations, undergo marked changes in their morphological, intrinsic, and synaptic properties between postnatal day 6 (P6) and P25. During maturation, action potential duration, propagation time, duration of the release period, and decay time constant of IPSCs decreases by similar to 30-60%. Thus, postnatal development converts BCs from slow into fast signaling devices. Computational analysis reveals that BC networks with young intrinsic and synaptic properties as well as reduced connectivity generate oscillations with moderate coherence in the lower gamma frequency range. In contrast, BC networks with mature properties and increased connectivity generate highly coherent activity in the upper gamma frequency band. Thus, late postnatal maturation of BCs enhances coherence in neuronal networks and will thereby contribute to the development of cognitive brain functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据