4.7 Article

Modulation of phosphodiesterase6 turnoff during background illumination in mouse rod photoreceptors

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 28, 期 9, 页码 2064-2074

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2973-07.2008

关键词

photoreceptor; rod; transduction; adaptation; phosphodiesterase; vision

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY01844, EY11522, R01 EY018213, K08-EY004081, R01 EY011522, R37 EY001844, R01 EY001844-31, R01 EY001844] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In rod photoreceptors of wild-type mice, background light produces an acceleration of the decay of responses to brief flashes, accompanied by a decrease in the rate-limiting time constant for response decay. In rods in which phosphodiesterase gamma( PDE gamma) lacks one of its sites of phosphorylation (T35A rods), both the waveform of response decay and the rate-limiting time constant are nearly unaffected by backgrounds. These effects are not the result of the removal of the phosphorylation site per se, because rods lacking both of the phosphorylation sites of PDE gamma (T22A/T35A rods) adapt to light in a nearly normal manner. Because PDE gamma is one of the proteins of the GTPase activating protein ( GAP) complex, our experiments argue for a novel mechanism of photoreceptor light adaptation produced by modulation of GAP-dependent hydrolysis of transducin alpha GTP. In PDE gamma T35A rods, a change in the conformation of the PDE gamma subunit may hinder or mask this mechanism, which in mammals appears to be primarily responsible for the quickening of the temporal resolution of the rod response in backgrounds. Modulation of PDE turnoff also helps to prevent premature saturation of the rod in bright backgrounds, thus making an important contribution to light adaptation. Our experiments provide evidence for modulation of GAP protein-dependent response turnoff, which may also play a role in controlling signal duration at hormone receptors and synapses in the CNS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据