4.7 Article

Prefrontal-inferotemporal interaction is not always necessary for reversal learning

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 28, 期 21, 页码 5529-5538

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0952-08.2008

关键词

monkey; reversal learning; PFC; IT; executive function; inhibition; macaque; memory; prefrontal

资金

  1. MRC [MC_qA137504] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_qA137504] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_QA137504] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prefrontal cortex (PFC) is thought to have a wide-ranging role in cognition, often described as executive function or behavioral inhibition. A specific example of such a role is the inhibition of representations in more posterior regions of cortex in a top-down manner, a function thought to be tested by reversal learning tasks. The direct action of PFC on posterior regions can be directly tested by disconnecting PFC from the region in question. We tested whether PFC directly inhibits visual object representations in inferotemporal cortex ( IT) during reversal learning by studying the effect, in macaque monkeys, of disconnecting PFC from IT by crossed unilateral ablations. We tested two visual object reversal learning tasks, namely serial and concurrent reversal learning. We found that the disconnection severely impairs serial reversal learning but leaves concurrent reversal learning completely intact. Thus, PFC cannot be said to always have direct inhibitory control over visual object representations in reversal learning. Furthermore, our results cannot be explained by generalized theories of PFC function such as executive function and behavioral inhibition, because those theories do not make predictions that differentiate different forms of reversal learning. The results do, however, support our proposal, based on other experimental evidence from macaque monkeys, that PFC has a highly specific role in the representation of temporally complex events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据