4.7 Article

Abnormal neural oscillatory activity to speech sounds in schizophrenia: A magnetoencephalography study

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 28, 期 19, 页码 4897-4903

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5031-07.2008

关键词

evoked oscillatory activity; schizophrenia; speech sounds; magnetoencephalography; lateralization; wavelet transform

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Schizophrenia impairs many cognitive functions, and abnormalities in language processing have been proposed as one of the bases for this disorder. Previously, it was reported that different magnetoencephalography (MEG) patterns of the evoked oscillatory activity (e0A) of 20-45 Hz to speech and nonspeech sounds were evidence of a fast mechanism for the representation and identification of speech sounds in humans. The current study tested the hypothesis that the schizophrenics would show abnormal neural oscillatory activity, as measured by e0A, to speech and nonspeech sounds. Twenty patients and 23 control subjects participated in this study. MEG responses to speech and nonspeech sounds were recorded and e0A power and phase locking at 20-45 Hz were analyzed. Patients showed significantly delayed peak latencies of the e0A power and phase locking to speech sounds in the left hemisphere and to nonspeech sounds in the right hemisphere. Patients also showed a significantly reduced e0A power to speech sounds in the left hemisphere in 0-50 ms and a significantly larger e0A power to speech sounds in the left hemisphere in 100-150 ms. In addition, the analyses of the lateralization index revealed the pattern of hemispheric lateralization to be the opposite in patients. These results indicated that patients showed different characteristics of e0A compared with normal controls, probably related to deficits in a fast mechanism for identifying speech sounds. Moreover, the present study suggests that schizophrenia might be characterized by an opposite pattern of hemispheric lateralization in auditory evoked oscillations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据