4.7 Article

Protein kinase a-induced phosphorylation of the p65 subunit of nuclear Factor-κB promotes Schwann cell differentiation into a myelinating phenotype

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 28, 期 14, 页码 3738-3746

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4439-07.2008

关键词

glia; Schwann; myelin; cAMP; nuclear factor-kappa B; Oct-6

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS04248] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Axon - Schwann cell interactions are critical for myelin formation during peripheral nerve development and regeneration. Axonal contact promotes Schwann cell precursors to differentiate into a myelinating phenotype, and cAMP- elevating agents can mimic this; however, the mechanisms underlying this differentiation are poorly understood. We demonstrated previously that the transcription factor nuclear factor- kappa B( NF- kappa B) is required for myelin formation by Schwann cells ( Nickols et al., 2003), although how it is activated during this process remained to be determined. Here, we report that culturing Schwann cells with sensory neurons results in the activation of cAMP dependent protein kinase ( PKA), and this kinase phosphorylates the p65 subunit of NF- kappa Bat S276. The phosphorylation was also induced in cultured Schwann cells by treatment with forskolin, dibutyryl- cAMP, or by overexpression of a catalytic subunit of PKA, and this increased the transcriptional activity of NF- kappa B. In developing perinatal rat sciatic nerve, the kinetics of p65 phosphorylation at S276 paralleled that of PKA and NF-kappa B activation. To elucidate the role of p65 phosphorylation in myelin formation, we overexpressed an S276A mutant of p65 in cultured Schwann cells, which blocked PKA- mediated transcriptional activation of NF- kappa B. When the Schwann cells expressing the mutant were cocultured with sensory neurons, there was a 45% reduction in the number of myelinated fibers relative to controls, demonstrating a requirement for p65 phosphorylation by PKA during myelin formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据