4.7 Article

In DRG11 knock-out mice, trigeminal cell death is extensive and does not account for failed brainstem patterning

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 28, 期 14, 页码 3577-3585

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4203-07.2008

关键词

transcription factors; Bax; barrels; whiskers; principalis; interpolaris

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS046036, R01-NS046036, P01 NS049048-22, P01 NS049048, R01 NS038331, R01-NS38331, P01-NS049048] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A previous study ( Ding et al., 2003) showed that the homeodomain transcription factor DRG11 is necessary for pattern formation in the trigeminal nucleus principalis ( PrV), the requisite brainstem nucleus for development of the whisker- to- barrel cortex pathway. However, it is not known how DRG11 contributes to pattern formation. Anatomical studies were performed in DRG11 knock- out ( -/-) and DRG11/ Bax double -/- mice to test the hypotheses that DRG11 is required for neuronal survival in the V pathway and that PrV cell death is sufficient to explain pattern alterations. At birth, DRG11(-/-) mice had equivalent cell loss in the V ganglion, PrV, and spinal V subnucleus interpolaris ( SpVi). Because whisker- related patterns were normal in the SpVi, cell death would not appear to explain failed pattern formation in the mutant PrV. Electron microscopy revealed exuberant apoptosis and necrosis as the mechanisms of PrV cell death occurring in the late prenatal and newborn DRG11(-/-), when such cell death was up to six times more prevalent than normal. DRG11 heterozygote and Bax -/ - mice were crossed in an attempt to dissociate PrV patterning anomalies from exuberant apoptosis in DRG11(-/-) mice. Both DRG11(-/-) and DRG11/Bax double(-/-) mutants lacked whisker- related patterning in their PrV, despite Bax(-/-)- induced rescue of V ganglion and PrV cells. Thus, apoptotic cell death is not a sufficient cause of failed pattern formation in the PrV of the DRG11(-/-). A signaling pathway involving DRG11 may, therefore, be the elusive PrV pattern maker.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据