4.7 Article

Deficits in phosphorylation of GABAA receptors by intimately associated protein kinase C activity underlie compromised synaptic inhibition during status epilepticus

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 376-384

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4346-07.2008

关键词

synaptic inhibition; protein kinase C; endocytosis; GABA(A) receptor; phosphorylation; status epilepticus

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G120/972] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [MH071705, P20 MH071705] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS054770, R01 NS032403, R37 NS032403, R01 NS046478, NS 046478, NS 051195, NS 032403, R01 NS038572-10, R01 NS054770, R01 NS038572, P01 NS054900-02, R37 NS032403-15, NS 056359, NS 048045, P01NS054900, P01 NS054900, NS 038572] Funding Source: Medline
  4. MRC [G120/972] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [G120/972] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Status epilepticus ( SE) is a progressive and often lethal human disorder characterized by continuous or rapidly repeating seizures. Of major significance in the pathology of SE are deficits in the functional expression of GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)Rs), the major sites of fast synaptic inhibition in the brain. We demonstrate that SE selectively decreases the phosphorylation of GABAARs on serine residues 408/9 (S408/9) in the beta 3 subunit by intimately associated protein kinase C isoforms. Dephosphorylation of S408/9 unmasks a basic patch-binding motif for the clathrin adaptor AP2, enhancing the endocytosis of selected GABA(A)R subtypes from the plasma membrane during SE. In agreement with this, enhancing S408/9 phosphorylation or selectively blocking the binding of the beta 3 subunit to AP2 increased GABA(A)R cell surface expression levels and restored the efficacy of synaptic inhibition in SE. Thus, enhancing phosphorylation of GABA(A)Rs or selectively blocking their interaction with AP2 may provide novel therapeutic strategies to ameliorate SE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据