4.3 Article

Magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the medial wall of the cavernous sinus for the assessment of cavernous sinus invasion by pituitary adenomas

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
卷 40, 期 4, 页码 245-251

出版社

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurad.2013.06.003

关键词

Cavernous sinus; Medial wall; Pituitary adenoma; Magnetic resonance imaging; Proton-density-weighted imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The diagnostic criteria for cavernous sinus invasion (CSI) by pituitary adenomas are still unsatisfactory and controversial. For this reason, the study examined the appearance of the medial wall of the cavernous sinus (MWCS) on proton-density-weighted (PDW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine its value for preoperative assessment of CSI. Methods: A 3.0-Testa MRI scanner was used to obtain preoperative PDW images and conventional MRI sequences of 48 consecutive pituitary adenomas, and the MWCS was examined in PDW images to determine the presence of CSI in comparison to surgical findings and three traditional MRI criteria: Knosp grading system (KGS); percentage of encasement of the internal carotid artery (PEICA); and replacement of cavernous sinus compartments (RCSC) by tumors. The value of the MWCS as seen on MRI was compared with that of the Ki-67 labelling index (Ki-67 LI). Results: CSI images showed that continuity of the MWCS was interrupted and that tumor tissue had infiltrated the cavernous sinus (CS) compartments through the defects. In 96 CSs from 48 patients, the sensitivity of MRI visualization of the MWCS for detection of CSI was 93.3% with a specificity of 93.8%, which was significantly higher than with KGS, PEICA and RCSC (P=0.007, P=0.008 and P=0.056, respectively). Histopathological results showed no significant differences between MRI visualization of the MWCS and the Ki-67 LI. Conclusion: PDW imaging permits adequate visualization of the MWCS and is superior to traditional diagnostic criteria for the detection of CSI, providing accurate preoperative images for intraoperative navigation. (C) 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据