4.4 Article

The dynamics of invariant object recognition in the human visual system

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 111, 期 1, 页码 91-102

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00394.2013

关键词

vision; decoding; magnetoencephalography; object recognition; invariance

资金

  1. Defense Advanced Research Planning Agency (Information Processing Techniques Office and Defense Sciences Office), National Science Foundation [NSF-0640097, NSF-0827427]
  2. Airforce Office of Scientific Research [FA8650-05-C-7262]
  3. Adobe, Honda Research Institute USA
  4. King Abdullah University Science and Technology
  5. NSF [0645960]
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM007484] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human visual system can rapidly recognize objects despite transformations that alter their appearance. The precise timing of when the brain computes neural representations that are invariant to particular transformations, however, has not been mapped in humans. Here we employ magnetoencephalography decoding analysis to measure the dynamics of size- and position-invariant visual information development in the ventral visual stream. With this method we can read out the identity of objects beginning as early as 60 ms. Size- and position-invariant visual information appear around 125 ms and 150 ms, respectively, and both develop in stages, with invariance to smaller transformations arising before invariance to larger transformations. Additionally, the magnetoencephalography sensor activity localizes to neural sources that are in the most posterior occipital regions at the early decoding times and then move temporally as invariant information develops. These results provide previously unknown latencies for key stages of human-invariant object recognition, as well as new and compelling evidence for a feed-forward hierarchical model of invariant object recognition where invariance increases at each successive visual area along the ventral stream.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据