4.4 Article

Temporal response properties of koniocellular (blue-on and blue-off) cells in marmoset lateral geniculate nucleus

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 112, 期 6, 页码 1421-1438

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00077.2014

关键词

lateral geniculate nucleus; vision; color vision

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council grant [1027913]
  2. Australian Research Council grant [CE140100007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Visual perception requires integrating signals arriving at different times from parallel visual streams. For example, signals carried on the phasic-magnocellular (MC) pathway reach the cerebral cortex pathways some tens of milliseconds before signals traveling on the tonic-parvocellular (PC) pathway. Visual latencies of cells in the koniocellular (KC) pathway have not been specifically studied in simian primates. Here we compared MC and PC cells to blue-on (BON) and blue-off (BOF) KC cells; these cells carry visual signals originating in short-wavelength-sensitive (S) cones. We made extracellular recordings in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of anesthetized marmosets. We found that BON visual latencies are 10-20 ms longer than those of PC or MC cells. A small number of recorded BOF cells (n = 7) had latencies 10-20 ms longer than those of BON cells. Within all cell groups, latencies of foveal receptive fields (< 10 degrees eccentricity) were longer (by 3-8 ms) than latencies of peripheral receptive fields (> 10 degrees). Latencies of yellow-off inputs to BON cells lagged the blue-on inputs by up to 30 ms, but no differences in visual latency were seen on comparing marmosets expressing dichromatic (red-green color-blind) or trichromatic color vision phenotype. We conclude that S-cone signals leaving the LGN on KC pathways are delayed with respect to signals traveling on PC and MC pathways. Cortical circuits serving color vision must therefore integrate across delays in (red-green) chromatic signals carried by PC cells and (blue-yellow) signals carried by KC cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据