4.4 Article

A simple model of mechanotransduction in primate glabrous skin

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 109, 期 5, 页码 1350-1359

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00395.2012

关键词

somatosensory perception; mechanoreceptive afferents; primate; SA; RA; Pacinian afferents; computational model; integrate-and-fire neurons; expectation minimization

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R0-1EY-016281, 5R01-NS-40596, R01-NS-18787]
  2. National Science Foundation [IOS-1150209]
  3. Office of Naval Research [N000141010278]
  4. Samsung Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dong Y, Mihalas S, Kim SS, Yoshioka T, Bensmaia S, Niebur E. A simple model of mechanotransduction in primate glabrous skin. J Neurophysiol 109: 1350-1359, 2013. First published December 12, 2012; doi:10.1152/jn.00395.2012.-Tactile stimulation of the hand evokes highly precise and repeatable patterns of activity in mechanoreceptive afferents; the strength (i.e., firing rate) and timing of these responses have been shown to convey stimulus information. To achieve an understanding of the mechanisms underlying the representation of tactile stimuli in the nerve, we developed a two-stage computational model consisting of a nonlinear mechanical transduction stage followed by a generalized integrate-and-fire mechanism. The model improves upon a recently published counterpart in two important ways. First, complexity is dramatically reduced (at least one order of magnitude fewer parameters). Second, the model comprises a saturating nonlinearity and therefore can be applied to a much wider range of stimuli. We show that both the rate and timing of afferent responses are predicted with remarkable precision and that observed adaptation patterns and threshold behavior are well captured. We conclude that the responses of mechanoreceptive afferents can be understood using a very parsimonious mechanistic model, which can then be used to accurately simulate the responses of afferent populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据