4.4 Article

Identification of CaV channel types expressed in muscle afferent neurons

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 110, 期 7, 页码 1535-1543

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00069.2013

关键词

Ca(V)2.2; Ca(V)2.1; Ca(V)2.3; dorsal root ganglia neurons; exercise pressor reflex

资金

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Grant [AR-059397]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiovascular adjustments to exercise are partially mediated by group III/IV (small to medium) muscle afferents comprising the exercise pressor reflex (EPR). However, this reflex can be inappropriately activated in disease states (e.g., peripheral vascular disease), leading to increased risk of myocardial infarction. Here we investigate the voltage-dependent calcium (Ca-V) channels expressed in small to medium muscle afferent neurons as a first step toward determining their potential role in controlling the EPR. Using specific blockers and 5 mM Ba2+ as the charge carrier, we found the major calcium channel types to be Ca(V)2.2 (N-type) > Ca(V)2.1 (P/Q-type) > Ca(V)1.2 (L-type). Surprisingly, the Ca(V)2.3 channel (R-type) blocker SNX482 was without effect. However, R-type currents are more prominent when recorded in Ca2+ (Liang and Elmslie 2001). We reexamined the channel types using 10 mM Ca2+ as the charge carrier, but results were similar to those in Ba2+. SNX482 was without effect even though similar to 27% of the current was blocker insensitive. Using multiple methods, we demonstrate that Ca(V)2.3 channels are functionally expressed in muscle afferent neurons. Finally, ATP is an important modulator of the EPR, and we examined the effect on Ca-V currents. ATP reduced Ca-V current primarily via G protein beta gamma-mediated inhibition of Ca(V)2.2 channels. We conclude that small to medium muscle afferent neurons primarily express Ca(V)2.2 > Ca(V)2.1 >= Ca(V)2.3 > Ca(V)1.2 channels. As with chronic pain, Ca(V)2.2 channel blockers may be useful in controlling inappropriate activation of the EPR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据