4.4 Article

Task-dependent changes in cortical excitability and effective connectivity: a combined TMS-EEG study

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 107, 期 9, 页码 2383-2392

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00707.2011

关键词

electroencephalography; transcranial magnetic stimulation

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [MH-88115-02, MH-064498-05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Johnson JS, Kundu B, Casali AG, Postle BR. Task-dependent changes in cortical excitability and effective connectivity: a combined TMS-EEG study. J Neurophysiol 107: 2383-2392, 2012. First published February 8, 2012; doi:10.1152/jn.00707.2011.-The brain's electrical response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is known to be influenced by exogenous factors such as the frequency and intensity of stimulation and the orientation and positioning of the stimulating coil. Less understood, however, is the influence of endogenous neural factors, such as global brain state, on the TMS-evoked response (TMS-ER). In the present study, we explored how changes in behavioral state affect the TMS-ER by perturbing the superior parietal lobule (SPL) with single pulses of TMS and measuring consequent differences in the frequency, strength, and spatial spread of TMS-evoked currents during the delay period of a spatial short-term memory task and during a period of passive fixation. Results revealed that task performance increased the overall strength of electrical currents induced by TMS, increased the spatial spread of TMS-evoked activity to distal brain regions, and increased the ability of TMS to reset the phase of ongoing broadband cortical oscillations. By contrast, task performance had little effect on the dominant frequency of the TMS-ER, both locally and at distal brain areas. These findings contribute to a growing body of work using combined TMS and neuroimaging methods to explore task-dependent changes in the functional organization of cortical networks implicated in task performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据