4.4 Article

The Time Course of Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Involvement in Memory Formation

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 103, 期 3, 页码 1569-1579

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.90937.2008

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust Research Career Development [WT073147]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Machizawa MG, Kalla R, Walsh V, Otten LJ. The time course of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in memory formation. J Neurophysiol 103: 1569-1579, 2010. First published January 20, 2010; doi: 10.1152/jn.90937.2008. Human neuroimaging studies have implicated a number of brain regions in long-term memory formation. Foremost among these is ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Here, we used double-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess whether the contribution of this part of cortex is crucial for laying down new memories and, if so, to examine the time course of this process. Healthy adult volunteers performed an incidental encoding task (living/nonliving judgments) on sequences of words. In separate series, the task was performed either on its own or while TMS was applied to one of two sites of experimental interest (left/right anterior inferior frontal gyrus) or a control site (vertex). TMS pulses were delivered at 350, 750, or 1,150 ms following word onset. After a delay of 15 min, memory for the items was probed with a recognition memory test including confidence judgments. TMS to all three sites nonspecifically affected the speed and accuracy with which judgments were made during the encoding task. However, only TMS to prefrontal cortex affected later memory performance. Stimulation of left or right inferior frontal gyrus at all three time points reduced the likelihood that a word would later be recognized by a small, but significant, amount (similar to 4%). These findings indicate that bilateral ventrolateral prefrontal cortex plays an essential role in memory formation, exerting its influence between >= 350 and 1,150 ms after an event is encountered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据