4.4 Article

Spike Transmission Delay at the Calyx of Held In Vivo: Rate Dependence, Phenomenological Modeling, and Relevance for Sound Localization

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 102, 期 2, 页码 1206-1217

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00275.2009

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG [Ru390-18/1]
  2. Graduate Program INTERNEURO [GRK 1097]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tolnai S, Englitz B, Scholbach J, Jost J, Rubsamen R. Spike transmission delay at the calyx of Held in vivo: rate dependence, phenomenological modeling, and relevance for sound localization. J Neurophysiol 102: 1206-1217, 2009. First published June 10, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.00275.2009. Transmission at central synapses exhibits rapid changes in response amplitude under different patterns of stimulation. Whether the delay associated with the transmission of action potentials is similarly modifiable is important for temporally precise computations. We address this question at the calyx of Held of the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB) in Mongolian gerbils in vivo using extracellular recordings. Here the pre-and postsynaptic activity can be observed simultaneously, allowing the definition of an action potential transmission delay (ATD) from the pre-to the postsynaptic side. We find the ATD to increase as a function of spike rate (10-40%). The temporal dynamics of the ATD increase exhibit an exponential shape with activity-dependent time constants (similar to 15-25 ms). Recovery dynamics of ATD were mono( 20-70 ms) or biexponential with fast (3-20 ms) and slow time constants (50-500 ms). Using a phenomenological model to capture ATD dynamics, we estimated Delta ATD = 5-30 mu s per transmitted action potential. Using vocalizations and cage noise stimuli, we confirm that substantial changes in ATD occur in natural situations. Because the ATD changes cover the behaviorally relevant range of interaural time differences in gerbils, these results could provide constraints for models of sound localization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据