4.4 Article

Nasal solitary chemoreceptor cell responses to bitter and trigeminal stimulants in vitro

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 99, 期 6, 页码 2929-2937

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00066.2008

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [P30 DC004657-069002, R01 DC006070-02, F31 DC008275-02, R01 DC-006070, F31 DC008275-01, P30 DC004657, R01 DC006070-03, P30 DC004657-099002, R01 DC006070, P30 DC-04657, F31 DC008275, R01 DC006070-05, R01 DC006070-04, P30 DC004657-079002, DC-008275-01, P30 DC004657-089002] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nasal trigeminal chemosensitivity in mice and rats is mediated in part by epithelial solitary chemoreceptor ( chemosensory) cells (SCCs), but the exact role of these cells in chemoreception is unclear. Histological evidence suggests that SCCs express elements of the bitter taste transduction pathway including T2R ( bitter taste) receptors, the G protein alpha-gustducin, PLC beta 2, and TRPM5, leading to speculation that SCCs are the receptor cells that mediate trigeminal nerve responses to bitter taste receptor ligands. To test this hypothesis, we used calcium imaging to determine whether SCCs respond to classic bitter-tasting or trigeminal stimulants. SCCs from the anterior nasal cavity were isolated from transgenic mice in which green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression was driven by either TRPM5 or gustducin. Isolated cells were exposed to a variety of test stimuli to determine which substances caused an increase in intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+](i)). GFP-positive cells respond with increased [Ca2+](i) to the bitter receptor ligand denatonium and this response is blocked by the PLC inhibitor U73122. In addition, GFP+ cells respond to the neuromodulators adenosine 5'-triphosphate and acetylcholine but only very rarely to other bitter-tasting or trigeminal stimuli. Our results demonstrate that TRPM5- and gustducin-expressing nasal SCCs respond to the T2R agonist denatonium via a PLC-coupled transduction cascade typical of T2Rs in the taste system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据