4.4 Article

Na+, K+, 2Cl- cotransport and intracellular chloride regulation in rat primary sensory neurons:: Thermodynamic and kinetic aspects

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 100, 期 1, 页码 169-184

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01007.2007

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adult primary afferent neurons are depolarized by GABA throughout their entire surface, including their somata located in dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Primary afferent depolarization (PAD) mediated by GABA released from spinal interneurons determines presynaptic inhibition, a key mechanism in somatosensory processing. The depolarization is due to Cl- efflux through GABA(A) channels; the outward Cl- gradient is generated by a Na+, K+, 2Cl(-) cotransporter (NKCC) as first established in amphibians. Using fluorescence imaging microscopy we measured [Cl-](i) and cell water volume (CWV) in dissociated rat DRG cells (P0-P21) loaded with N-(ethoxycarbonylmethyl)-6-methoxyquinolinium bromide and calcein, respectively. Basal [Cl-](i) was 44.2 +/- 1.2 mM (mean +/- SE), Cl- equilibrium potential (E-Cl) was -27.0 +/- 0.7 mV (n = 75). This [Cl-](i) is about four times higher than electrochemical equilibrium. On isosmotic removal of external Cl-, cells lost Cl- and shrank. On returning to control solution, cells reaccumulated Cl- and recovered CWV. Cl- reaccumulation had Na+ -dependent (SDC) and Na+ -independent (SIC) components. The SIC stabilized at [Cl-](i) = 13.2 +/- 1.2 mM, suggesting that it was passive (E-Cl = -60.5 +/- 3 mV). Bumetanide blocked CWV recovery and most (65%) of the SDC (IC50 = 5.7 mu M), indicating that both were mediated by NKCC. Active Cl- uptake fell with increasing [Cl-](i) and became negligible when [Cl-](i) reached basal levels. The kinetics of active Cl- uptake suggests a negative feedback system in which intracellular Cl- regulates its own influx thereby keeping [Cl-](i) constant, above electrochemical equilibrium but below the value that would attain if NKCC reached thermodynamic equilibrium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据