4.4 Article

Morphology, intrinsic membrane properties, and rotation-evoked responses of trochlear motoneurons in the turtle

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 99, 期 3, 页码 1187-1200

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01205.2007

关键词

-

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [F32 EY 016956] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intrinsic properties and rotation-evoked responses of trochlear motoneurons were investigated in the turtle using an in vitro preparation consisting of the brain stem with attached temporal bones that retain functional semicircular canals. Motoneurons were divided into two classes based on intrinsic properties. The first class exhibited higher impedance ( 123.0 +/- 11.0 M Omega), wider spikes ( 0.99 +/- 0.05 ms), a single spike afterhyperpolarization ( AHP), little or no spike frequency adaptation ( SFA), and anomalous rectification, characterized by an initial sag in membrane potential in response to hyperpolarizing current injection. The second class exhibited lower impedance ( 21.8 +/- 2.5 M Omega), narrower spikes ( 0.74 +/- 0.03 ms), a double AHP, substantial SFA, and little or no rectification. Vestibular responses were evoked by horizontal sinusoidal rotation ( 1/12-1/3 Hz; peak velocity: 30-100 degrees/ s). Spiking in higher-impedance cells was recruited earlier in the response and exhibited a more limited dynamic range relative to that of lower impedance cells. Spiking evoked by injecting depolarizing current during rotation was blocked during contraversive motion and was consistent with a shunting inhibition. No morphological features were identified in neurobiotin-filled cells that correlated with the two physiological classes. Recovered motoneurons were multipolar but exhibited a less-complex dendritic morphology than ocular motoneurons of similarly sized mammals. The two physiologically defined cell classes have homologues in other vertebrates, suggesting that intrinsic membrane properties play an important role in oculomotor processing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据