4.3 Article

Synaptic Proteins and Choline Acetyltransferase Loss in Visual Cortex in Dementia With Lewy Bodies

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31827c5710

关键词

gamma-Synuclein; ChAT activity; Dementia with Lewy body; Occipital lobe; SNAP-25; Synaptic proteins; Synaptophysin

资金

  1. PPP Grant
  2. Alzheimer Society
  3. UK NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Ageing and Age-Related Disease Award
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  5. Alzheimers Research UK [ART-ESG2010-6] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [G0700718B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Functional neuroimaging studies have consistently reported abnormalities in the visual cortex in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), but their neuropathologic substrates are poorly understood. We analyzed synaptic proteins and choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) in the primary (BA17) and association (BAs18/19) visual cortex in DLB and similar aged control and Alzheimer disease (AD) subjects. We found lower levels of synaptophysin, syntaxin, SNAP-25, and gamma-synuclein in DLB subjects versus both aged control (68%-78% and 27%-72% for BA17 and BAs18/19, respectively) and AD cases (54%-67% and 10%-56% for BA17 and BAs18/19, respectively). The loss in ChAT activity in DLB cases was also greater in BA17 (72% and 87% vs AD and control values, respectively) than in BAs18/19 (52% and 65% vs AD and control groups, respectively). The observed synaptic and ChAT changes in the visual cortices were not associated with tau or A-amyloid pathology in the occipital or the frontal, temporal, and parietal neocortex. However, the neocortical densities of LBs, particular those in BA17 and BAs18/19, correlated with lower synaptic and ChAT levels in these brain areas. These findings draw attention to molecular changes within the primary visual cortex in DLB and correlate with the neuroimaging findings within the occipital lobe in patients with this disorder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据