4.3 Article

Laforin and Malin Deletions in Mice Produce Similar Neurologic Impairments

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e318253350f

关键词

Animal models; EEG; Laforin; Malin; Progressive myoclonus epilepsy

资金

  1. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias from the Spanish Ministry of Health [PI070023]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [SAF2010-18586]
  3. Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Raras, Madrid, Spain
  4. Fundacion Marato TV3 [100130]
  5. Fundacion Conchita Rabago

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lafora disease is a progressive myoclonus epilepsy caused by mutations in the EPM2A gene encoding laforin or in the EPM2B gene encoding malin. It is characterized by the presence of polyglucosan intracellular inclusion bodies (Lafora bodies) in brain and other tissues. Targeted disruption of Epm2a or Epm2b genes in mice produced widespread neuronal degeneration and accumulation of Lafora bodies in neuronal and nonneuronal tissues. Here we analyzed the neurologic alterations produced by disruption of the laforin gene in Epm2a(-/-) mice and compared them to those in malin-deficient mice. Both Epm2a(-/-) and Epm2b(-/-) mice showed altered motor activity, impaired motor coordination, abnormal hind limb clasping, and episodic memory deficits. Epm2a(-/-) mice also had tonic-clonic seizures, whereas both Epm2a(-/-) and Epm2b(-/-) mice had spontaneous single spikes, spike-wave, polyspikes, and polyspike-wave complexes with correlated myoclonic jerks. Neurologic alterations observed in the mutants were comparable and correlated with the accumulation of abundant Lafora bodies in the cerebral cortex, the hippocampus, the basal ganglia, the cerebellum, and the brainstem, suggesting that these inclusions could cause cognitive and behavioral deterioration. Thus, both Epm2a(-/-) and Epm2b(-/-) mice exhibit many pathologic aspects seen in patients with Lafora disease and may be valuable for the study of this disorder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据