4.3 Article

Delayed Maturation and Differentiation of Neurons in Focal Cortical Dysplasia With the Transmantle Sign: Analysis of Layer-Specific Marker Expression

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e318262e41a

关键词

Epilepsy; Focal cortical dysplasia; Layer-specific markers; Neural maturation; Transmantle dysplasia; Transmantle sign

资金

  1. National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry [21B5, 22A3]
  2. Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan (Research on Intractable Disease) [21-110, 22-133]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22659197] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transmantle dysplasia is a rare type of focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) characterized by expansion of the cortex from the deep white matter to the surface and in which there is a FCD IIA or IIB pathologic pattern. To characterize possible mechanisms underlying this regional disorder of radial migrating cells, we studied the expression patterns of neocortical layer-specific markers using immunohistochemistry in surgical specimens from 5 FCD IIA and 4 FCD IIB cases in children. All neuronal cells expressed the mature neuron marker MAP2/2B but not the microglia markers Iba-1 and CD68. Some layer-specific markers showed distinct expression patterns. TBR1-positive, SATB2-positive, and FOXP1-positive cells were diffusely distributed in the cortex and/or the white matter. TBR1-positive and FOXP1-positive cells were generally more numerous in FCD IIB than in FCD IIA and were mostly in the cortical molecular and upper layers. FOXP1-, FOXP2-, and CUTL1-positive cells also expressed the immature neuron marker, Nestin/PROX1, whereas TBR1-, CTIP2-, and SATB2-positive cells only expressed MAP2/2B. These data highlight differences between FCD IIB and FCD IIA with more cells having the immature marker in upper layer markers in the former. By analyzing layer-specific marker expression patterns, we identified apparent neuronal maturation differences between FCD IIA and FCD IIB in cases of transmantle dysplasia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据