4.3 Review

Neuronal-Astrocyte Metabolic Interactions: Understanding the Transition Into Abnormal Astrocytoma Metabolism

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31820e1152

关键词

Astrocyte; Glioma glycolysis; Hypoxia-inducible factor; Lactate; Metabolism; Mitochondria

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 NS051856, R01 AG037599]
  2. VA Merit Review Awards

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brain function depends on complex metabolic interactions among only a few different cell types, with astrocytes providing critical support for neurons. Astrocyte functions include buffering the extracellular space, providing substrates to neurons, interchanging glutamate and glutamine for synaptic transmission with neurons, and facilitating access to blood vessels. Whereas neurons possess highly oxidative metabolism and easily succumb to ischemia, astrocytes rely more on glycolytic metabolism and hence are less susceptible to lack of oxygen. Astrocytoma cells seem to retain basic metabolic mechanisms of astrocytes; for example, they show a high glycolytic rate, lactate extrusion, ability to flourish under hypoxia, and opportunistic use of mechanisms to enhance cell division and maintain growth. Differences in metabolism between neurons and astrocytes may also extend to astrocytoma cells, providing therapeutic opportunities against astrocytomas, including sensitivity to acetate, a high rate of glycolysis and lactate extrusion, glutamate uptake transporters, differential sensitivities of monocarboxylate transporters, presence of glycogen, high interlinking with gap junctions, use of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate for lipid synthesis, using different isoforms of synthetic enzymes (e. g. isocitrate dehydrogenase, pyruvate carboxylase, pyruvate kinase, lactate dehydrogenase), and different glucose uptake mechanisms. These unique metabolic susceptibilities may augment conventional therapeutic attacks based on cell division differences and surface receptors alone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据