4.3 Article

Morphologic and Functional Correlates of Synaptic Pathology in the Cathepsin D Knockout Mouse Model of Congenital Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e318238fc28

关键词

Cathepsin D; Electron microscopy; Electrophysiology; Hippocampus; Synapse; Synaptic vesicle

资金

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Batten Disease Family Association
  3. Natalie Fund
  4. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  5. Wellcome Trust
  6. Batten Disease Support and Research Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in the cathepsin D (CTSD) gene cause an aggressive neurodegenerative disease (congenital neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis) that leads to early death. Recent evidence suggests that presynaptic abnormalities play a major role in the pathogenesis of CTSD deficiencies. To identify the early events that lead to synaptic alterations, we investigated synaptic ultrastructure and function in presymptomatic CTSD knockout (Ctsd(-/-)) mice. Electron microscopy revealed that there were significantly greater numbers of readily releasable synaptic vesicles present in Ctsd(-/-) mice than in wild-type control mice as early as postnatal day 16. The size of this synaptic vesicle pool continued to increase with disease progression in the hippocampus and thalamus of the Ctsd(-/-) mice. Electrophysiology revealed a markedly decreased frequency of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) with no effect on paired-pulse modulation of the evoked excitatory post synaptic potentials in the hippocampus of Ctsd(-/-) mice. The reduced mEPSCs frequency was observed before the appearance of epilepsy or any morphologic sign of synaptic degeneration. Taken together, these data indicate that CTSD is required for normal synaptic function and that a failure in synaptic trafficking or recycling may be an early and important pathologic mechanism in Ctsd(-/-) mice; these presynaptic abnormalities may initiate synaptic degeneration in advance of subsequent neuronal loss.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据