4.3 Article

Distinct Neuropathologic Phenotypes After Disrupting the Chloride Transport Proteins ClC-6 or ClC-7/Ostm1

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181ffe742

关键词

Chloride channel; Chloride/proton exchanger; Grey lethal; Lysosomal storage disorder; Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis/Batten disease

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS41930]
  2. European Commission [LSHM-CT-2003-503051]
  3. UK Medical Research Council
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Je164/7, SFB 740]
  5. Academy of Finland [1122404]
  6. Batten Disease Support and Research Association
  7. The Batten Disease Family Association
  8. The Natalie Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proteins ClC-6 and ClC-7 are expressed in the endosomallysosomal system. Because Clcn6-deficient mice display some features of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (NCL), CLCN6 may be a candidate gene for novel forms of NCL. Using landmarks of disease progression from NCL mouse models as a guide, we examined neuropathologic alterations in the central nervous system of Clcn6(-/-), Clcn7(-/-), and gl mice. gl mice bear a mutation in Ostm1, the beta-subunit critical for Clcn7 function. Severely affected Clcn7(-/-) and gl mice have remarkably similar neuropathologic phenotypes, with pronounced reactive changes and neuron loss in the thalamocortical system, similar to findings in early-onset forms of NCL. In contrast, Clcn6(-/-) mice display slowly progressive, milder neuropathologic features with very little thalamic involvement or microglial activation. These findings detail for the first time the markedly different neuropathologic consequences of mutations in these two CLC genes. Clcn7(-/-) and gl mice bear a close resemblance to the progressive neuropathologic phenotypes of early onset forms of NCL, whereas the distinct phenotype of Clcn6-deficient mice suggests that this gene could be a candidate for a later-onset form of mild neurologic dysfunction with some NCL-like features.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据