4.3 Article

Amyloid β-Induced Nerve Growth Factor Dysmetabolism in Alzheimer Disease

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181aed9e6

关键词

Alzheimer disease; beta amyloid oligomers; Minocycline; Nerve growth factor; Peroxynitrite; pro-NGF

资金

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research [MOP 62735]
  2. US Alzhemier's Association [IIRG-06-25861]
  3. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET), Argentina

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We previously reported that the precussor form of nerve growth factor (pro-NGF) and not mature NGF is liberated in the CNS ill all activity-dependent manner, and that its maturation and degradation occur in the extracellur space by the coordinated action of proteases. Here, we present evidence of diminished conversion of proNGF to itsmature from and of greater NGF degradation in Alzheimer disease (AD) brain samples compared with controls. These alterations of the NGF metabolic pathway likely resulted in the increased proNGF levels. The pro-NGF was largely in a peroxynitrited form in the AD samples. Intrahippocampal injection of amyloid-beta oligomers provoked similar upregulation of pro-NGF in naive rats that was accompanied by evidence of microglial activation (CD40), increased levels of inducible nitric oxide synthase, and increased activity of the NGF-degrading enzyme matrix metalloproteinase 9. The elevated inducible nitric oxide synthase provoked the generation of biologically inactive, peroxynitrite-modified pro-NGF in amyloid-beta oligomer-injected rats. These parameters were corrected by minocycline treatment. Minocycline also diminished altered matrix metalloproteinase 9, inducible nitric oxide synthase, and microglial activation (CD40); improved cognitive behavior; and normalized pro-NGF levels ill a transgenic mouse AD model. The effects of amyloid-beta amyloid CNS burden oil NGF metabolism may explain the paradoxical upregulation of pro-NGF in AD accompanied by atrophy of forebrain cholinergic neurons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据