4.3 Article

Neprilysin and Insulin-Degrading Enzyme Levels Are Increased in Alzheimer Disease in Relation to Disease Severity

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181afe475

关键词

Alzheimer disease; Amyloid-beta peptide; Apolipoprotein E; Insulin-degarding enzyme; Neprilysin; Neuron-specific enolase

资金

  1. Bristol Research into Alzheimer's and Care of the Elderly (BRACE)
  2. James Tudor Foundation
  3. MRC [G0900627] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Alzheimers Research UK [ART-EG2005B-1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Medical Research Council [G0900627] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental reduction of neprilysin (NEP) or insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) in vivo exacerbates beta-amyloid accumulation in the brain. The level of these enzymes is reportedly reduced during aging and in postmortem brains of patients with sporadic Alzheimer disease (AD). To distinguish between primary decreases in NEP and IDE activity that might contribute to beta-amyloid accumulation and decreases secondary to neurodegenerative changes in AD we measured NEP and IDE levels by indirect sandwich ELISA and enzyme activities by immunocapture-based fluorogenic assays in postmortem frontal cortex front patients of different ages and at different pathological stages of AD, as indicated by Braak tangle stage. The ELISA measurements of neuron-specific enolase were used to adjust for neuronal loss. Both unadjusted and neuron-specific enolase-adjusted NEP levels and activity were significantly increased in AD and positively correlated with Braak stage but negatively with age in AD patients. Insulin-degrading enzyme activity was higher in AD than controls; this was significant after adjustment for neuron-specific enolase level; unadjusted IDE protein level was decreased in AD but not after adjustment. Our findings suggest that reduction in NEP and IDE activity is not the primary cause of beta-amyloid accumulation in AD, but rather a late-stage phenomenon secondary to neurodegeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据