4.3 Article

Accumulation of aspartic Acid421- and glutamic Acid391-Cleaved tau in neurofibrillary tangles correlates with progression in Alzheimer disease

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31817275c7

关键词

Alzheimer disease; ApoE epsilon 4 allele; Braak staging; neurofibrillary pathology; tau proteolysis; truncated tau

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 AG000257] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [T32 AG000257-10, R01 AG043375, P01 AG014449, T32 AG000257] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Truncations of tau protein at aspartic acid(421) (D-421) and glutamic acid(391) (E-391) residues are associated with neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) in the brains of Alzheimer disease (AD) patients. Using inarnumohistochemistry with antibodies to D-421- and E-391-truncated tau (Tau-C3 and MN423, respectively), we correlated the presence of NFTs composed of these truncated tau proteins with clinical and neuropathologic parameters in 17 AD and 23 non-AD control brains. The densities of NFTs composed of D-421- or E-391-truncated tau correlated with clinical dementia index and Braak staging in AD. Glutamic acid(391) tau truncation was prominent in the entorhinal cortex, whereas D-421 truncation was prominent in the subiculum, suggesting that NFTs composed of either D-421- or E-391-truncated tau may be formed mutually exclusively in these areas. Both truncations were associated with the prevalence of the apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 allele. By double labeling, intact tau in NFTs was commonly associated with D-421-deaved tau but not with E-391-truncated tau; D-421-cleaved tau was never associated with E-391-truncated tau. These results indicate that tau is not randomly proteolyzed at different domains, and that proteolysis occurs sequentially from the C-terminus to inner regions of tau in AD progression. Identification of NFTs composed of tau at different stages of truncation may facilitate assessment of neurofibrillary pathology in AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据