4.3 Article

Oxidative injury in the cerebral cortex and subplate neurons in periventricular leukomalacia

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31817e5c5e

关键词

cerebral palsy; dendritogenesis; free radical injury; prematurity; synaptogenesis

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [P30 HD018655, N01 HD 43383, N01 HD 43368, P30 HD 18655] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [P01 NS038475-01A10002, P01 NS 38475, P01 NS038475] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We previously identified irnmunocytochemical evidence of nitrative and oxidative injury in premyelinating oligodendrocytes in periventricular leukomalacia (PVL). Here, we tested the hypothesis that free radical injury occurs in the overlying cerebral cortex and subplate neurons in PVL. We immunostained for nitrotyrosine, malondialdehyde, and hydroxynonenal adducts and scored neuron staining density in PVL (n = 11) and non-PVL (n = 15) cases (postconceptional ages from 34 to 109 weeks). Analysis of covariance controlled for age. Mean malondialdehyde scores in PVL cases were increased over controls (p = 0.005). Hydroxynonenal scores increased with age only in PVL cases (diagnosis vs age interaction; p = 0.024). Nitrotyrosine scores were not significantly increased. In I I PVL and 23 control cases between 20 and 183 postconceptional weeks, cells morphologically consistent with subplate and Cajal-Retzius neurons showed qualitatively increased free radical modification in PVL over control cases with statistically significant odds ratios for hydroxynonenal and nitrotyrosine in both subplate neurons and Cajal-Retzius cells. Glial fibrillary acidic protein and CD68 scores for reactive astrocytes and microglia, respectively, were not significantly increased, suggesting a minimal inflammatory response. Thus, oxidative/nitrative damage to cortical and pioneer neurons, although mild overall, may contribute to cortical volume loss and cognitive/behavioral impairment in survivors of prematurity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据