4.6 Article

Fatigue at time of CIS is an independent predictor of a subsequent diagnosis of multiple sclerosis

期刊

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-308374

关键词

-

资金

  1. Dutch MS Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Fatigue is a common, disabling symptom of multiple sclerosis ( MS), but little is known about fatigue in patients with clinically isolated syndrome ( CIS), often the presenting symptom of MS. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and severity of fatigue in patients with CIS, and its association with a diagnosis of clinically definite MS ( CDMS). Methods 127 patients were consecutively included in our ongoing prospective CIS study. At baseline, clinical, demographic, laboratory and MRI data were collected, and fatigue severity was assessed using Krupp's Fatigue Severity Scale ( FSS); fatigue was defined as FSS >= 5.0. Fatigue scores were compared with scores of 113 healthy controls and with scores from the literature. The association of fatigue with CDMS was calculated using Cox regression models. Results The mean FSS of patients with CIS was 4.3, similar to MS patients, and significantly higher than that of healthy individuals ( p<0.001). Fatigue prevalence in patients with CIS ( 46.5%) was significantly higher than in controls ( p<0.001). Fifty-two patients ( 40.9%) reached CDMS during follow-up. Fatigue was associated with a diagnosis of CDMS in univariate analysis ( HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5 to 4.6) and in multivariate analysis correcting for sex, age, neuroanatomical localisation of CIS, 25-OH-vitamin D, anxiety, depression, MRI dissemination in space and gadolinium enhancement ( HR 4.5, 95% CI 1.9 to 10.6). Conclusions Already at the stage of CIS, fatigue is a very common symptom, with a severity similar to fatigue in MS patients. This fatigue seems unrelated to the type or severity of the attack. Importantly, we found that fatigue was an independent predictor of a subsequent diagnosis of MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据