4.6 Article

1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy indicates damage to cerebral white matter in the subacute phase after CO poisoning

期刊

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.222422

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science, Education, Sports and Culture, Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22592020] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective The authors examined whether 1 H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) can identify damage to the centrum semiovale in the subacute phase after CO exposure. Methods Subjects comprised 29 adult patients who were treated with hyperbaric oxygenation within a range of 4-95 h (mean 18.7 h) after CO exposure. Subjects were classified into three groups according to clinical behaviours: Group A, patients with transit acute symptoms only; Group P, patients with persistent neurological symptoms; and Group D, patients with 'delayed neuropsychiatric sequelae' occurring after a lucid interval. MRS of bilateral centrum semiovale was performed 2 weeks after CO inhalation for all patients and 13 healthy volunteers. The mean ratios of choline-containing compounds/creatine ((mean)Cho/Cr) and N-acetylaspartate/Cr ((mean)NAA/Cr) for bilateral centrum semiovale were calculated and compared between the three CO groups and controls. Myelin basic protein (MBP) concentration in cerebrospinal fluid was examined at 2 weeks to evaluate the degree of demyelination in patients. Results MBP concentration was abnormal for almost all patients in Groups P and D, but was not abnormal for any Group A patients. The (mean)Cho/Cr ratios were significantly higher in Groups P and D than in Group A. No significant difference in (mean)NAA/Cr ratio was seen between the three pathological groups and controls. A significant correlation was identified between MBP and (mean)Cho/Cr ratio. Conclusions These results suggest that the Cho/Cr ratio in the subacute phase after CO intoxication represents early demyelination in the centrum semiovale, and can predict chronic neurological symptoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据