4.6 Article

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease from other cortical dementias

期刊

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.207183

关键词

-

资金

  1. Association France Alzheimer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Considering that most semantic dementia (SD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) patients show no post-mortem Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers may be of value for distinguishing these patients from those with AD. Additionally, biomarkers may be useful for identifying patients with atypical phenotypic presentations of AD, such as posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) and primary progressive non-fluent or logopenic aphasia (PNFLA). Methods The authors investigated CSF biomarkers (beta-amyloid 1-42 (A beta(42)), total tau (T-tau) and phosphorylated tau (P-tau)) in 164 patients with AD (n=60), PCA (n=15), behavioural variant FTD (n=27), SD (n=19), PNFLA (n=26) and functional cognitive disorders (FCD, n=17). The authors then examined the diagnostic value of these CSF biomarkers in distinguishing these patients from those with AD. Results The P-Tau/A beta(42) ratio was found to be the best biomarker for distinguishing AD from FTD and SD, with a sensitivity of 91.7% and 98.3%, respectively, and a specificity of 92.6% and 84.2%, respectively. As expected, biomarkers were less effective in differentiating AD from PNFLA and PCA, as significant proportions of PCA and PNFLA patients (60% and 61.5%, respectively) had concurrent alterations of both T-tau/A beta(42) and P-Tau/A beta(42) ratios. None of the FCD patients had a typical AD CSF profile or abnormal T-tau/Ab42 or P-Tau/A beta(42) ratios. Conclusion The P-Tau/A beta(42) ratio is a useful tool to distinguish AD from both FTD and SD, which are known to involve pathological processes distinct from AD. Biomarkers could be useful for identifying patients with an atypical AD phenotype that includes PNFLA and PCA. the

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据