4.6 Article

Early intervention for mild cognitive impairment: a randomised controlled trial

期刊

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.148346

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alzheimer's Australia Research
  2. Caulfield Hospital
  3. La Trobe University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Positive effects are reported for memory training for healthy older adults, and yet there is limited information about the benefit of cognitive intervention for older adults with increasing memory difficulties-mild cognitive impairment. Objective: To investigate the usefulness of an early cognitive intervention for the memory difficulties experienced by people with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Methods: Using a randomised control design, 52 participants with amnestic mild cognitive impairment and their family partners were randomly assigned to a cognitive intervention (memory rehabilitation group) or waitlist (control group). Participants were assessed on primary measures of everyday memory (prospective memory) and memory strategies at 2 weeks' and 4 months' follow-up; secondary measures of contentment with memory and the family participants' knowledge of memory strategies were also assessed. Results: Everyday memory, measured by performance on prospective memory tasks, significantly improved following intervention, although self-appraisal of everyday memory did not demonstrate a similar intervention effect. Knowledge and use of memory strategies also significantly increased following intervention. Furthermore, family knowledge of memory strategies increased following intervention. There was a strong trend towards improvement in contentment with memory immediately following intervention, but this effect was not significant. Conclusions: Early intervention for memory difficulties in amnestic mild cognitive impairment, using cognitive rehabilitation in compensatory strategies, can assist in minimising everyday memory failures as evaluated by performance on prospective memory tasks and knowledge of memory strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据