4.7 Article

Striatal metabolism and psychomotor speed as predictors of motor onset in Huntington's disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 261, 期 7, 页码 1387-1397

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-014-7350-7

关键词

Huntington's disease; Premanifest; Biomarker; Psychomotor speed; Glucose metabolism

资金

  1. Prinses Beatrix Fonds [99-0209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The clinical diagnosis of Huntington's disease (HD) is based on the motor symptoms, although these can be preceded by cognitive and behavioral changes. Biomarker studies have shown that structural imaging modalities are useful biomarkers of HD onset, while functional imaging measures have been studied less often for this purpose. Our aim was to investigate the combined value of 18-fluorodesoxyglucose (FDG)-PET and cognitive measures as biomarkers of HD onset. Twenty-two premanifest mutation carriers of HD (PMCs) and 11 healthy controls were assessed twice with FDG-PET scan, neurological and neuropsychological assessments over a 2-year interval. Seventeen PMCs had an additional third neurological evaluation, 10 years after baseline. Disease load was defined as the probability of motor onset within 5 years. Metabolism in putamen, caudate and pallidum of PMCs was significantly lower than that of controls, at both assessments. Almost half of the PMCs had converted to manifest HD 10 years later and all converters had low average or abnormal putaminal metabolism at 2 year follow-up. In contrast, all PMCs with normal putaminal metabolism at 2 year follow-up remained premanifest during the following 8 years. Furthermore, glucose metabolism of putamen explained a substantial part of the variance in disease load. A composite score of psychomotor tests contributed significantly to the prediction model as well, while cognitive performance was comparable for PMCs and controls. We conclude that in future clinical trials a combination of psychomotor tests and putaminal glucose metabolism may be used to identify PMCs close to motor onset of HD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据