4.7 Article

Interest of CSF biomarker analysis in possible cerebral amyloid angiopathy cases defined by the modified Boston criteria

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 259, 期 11, 页码 2429-2433

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-012-6520-8

关键词

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy; Lobar hematoma; Superficial siderosis; A beta 40; A beta 42; t-tau; p-tau; CSF biomarkers

资金

  1. Novartis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to the modified Boston criteria, cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) can present with lobar hematoma (LH) or superficial siderosis (SS). Recently, decreased CSF beta-amyloid peptide 40 and 42 (A beta 40; A beta 42) and increased total and phosphorylated tau (t-tau; p-tau) concentrations have been described in CAA presenting with LH. Our aim was to analyze CSF biomarkers as a diagnostic tool for CAA according to the modified Boston criteria. We prospectively included patients with possible or probable CAA according to the modified Boston criteria. CSF was analyzed for t-tau, p-tau, A beta 42, and A beta 40. Data were compared with AD patients (n = 42) and controls (n = 14). Thirteen CAA patients were included, nine presenting with LH and four with SS. T-tau and p-tau levels in CAA were higher than controls, but lower than in AD. Differences in t-tau and p-tau levels between CAA versus controls and AD were all significant apart of the CAA p-tau levels comparison with controls. A beta 42 levels in CAA were significantly lower than in controls, and slightly higher than in AD, though non-significantly. A beta 40 levels in CAA were non-significantly lower than in controls, and significantly lower than in AD. Combining the findings of our study and the earlier report, we confirm that patients with suspected CAA have significantly different values for t-tau, A beta 42, A beta 42/t-tau, and A beta 40. Especially A beta 40 levels seem to be of clinical interest to differentiate CAA from AD. CSF biomarkers have to be analyzed in a larger number of CAA patients, and compared to patients with other disorders causing LH or SS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据