4.7 Article

Variant in the 3' region of SNCA associated with Parkinson's disease and serum α-synuclein levels

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 259, 期 3, 页码 497-504

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-011-6209-4

关键词

Parkinson's disease; SNCA; Serum alpha-synuclein; Rep1; rs11931074; Polymorphism

资金

  1. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB504100]
  2. National 863 High-Tech Research and Development Program of China [2006AA02A408]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30370515, 30570638, 30770735, 30900469, 81000542]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2011QNZT171]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder. The presence of Lewy bodies is a major pathological change of PD. alpha-synuclein is the main component of Lewy bodies and is encoded by the SNCA gene. Mutations in the SNCA gene mainly result in rare familial forms of PD, while genetic variability in the SNCA gene modulates susceptibility to sporadic PD. Recent studies have suggested that levels of alpha-synuclein in extracellular biological fluid are associated with PD and implicated alpha-synuclein as a potential biomarker for PD diagnosis and severity. We studied serum alpha-synuclein concentration and two polymorphic variants of SNCA (Rep1 and rs11931074) in 110 sporadic PD patients and 136 controls. We further explored the influence of the two polymorphisms on the expression levels of serum alpha-synuclein. Soluble alpha-synuclein was detected in serum in all subjects, with no statistically significant difference between PD patients and controls (p = 0.611). Different Rep1 alleles and genotypes did not influence the expression of serum alpha-synuclein. The frequency of allele T of rs11931074 was significantly elevated in PD patients (p = 0.041), and was correlated with decreased serum alpha-synuclein in both dominant (p = 0.011) and additive (p = 0.008) models of association.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据