4.7 Review

Energy failure in multiple sclerosis and its investigation using MR techniques

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 258, 期 12, 页码 2113-2127

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-011-6117-7

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Perfusion imaging; Oxygen consumption; N acetyl acetate; Lactate

资金

  1. UK Multiple Sclerosis Society
  2. University College London
  3. University College London Hospitals Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Energy failure is an emerging concept in multiple sclerosis research. Pathological studies have indicated that axonal modifications in response to demyelination may increase neuronal energy demand. At the same time, soluble mediators of inflammation may impair mitochondrial function, and brain perfusion may also be decreased. Insufficient energy production for demand can lead to intracellular sodium accumulation, calcium influx and cell death. Magnetic resonance (MR) is a promising technique to investigate these pathology driven hypotheses in vivo. MR spectroscopy can inform on mitochondrial function with measures of N acetyl aspartate (NAA), and requirement for extra-mitochondrial glycolysis via measurement of lactate. MR measurement of phosphorous (P-31) and sodium (Na-23) allows direct assessment of energy availability and axonal sodium handling. MR techniques for imaging perfusion can quantify oxygen delivery and nascent MR techniques that exploit the paramagnetism of deoxyhaemaglobin may be able to quantify oxygen utilization. This report reviews the physical principles underlying these techniques, their implementation for human in vivo imaging, and their application in neurological conditions with an emphasis on multiple sclerosis. Combination of these techniques to obtain a comprehensive picture of oxygen delivery, energy production and utilization may provide new insights into the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis and may provide outcome measures for trials of novel treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据