4.7 Article

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in human genetic transmissible spongiform encephalopathies

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 256, 期 10, 页码 1620-1628

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-009-5163-x

关键词

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; CSF proteins; 14-3-3 protein; Tau

资金

  1. European Commission (EC) [QLG3-CT-2002-81606]
  2. Greek Ministry of Health, through KEEL, in Italy
  3. Ministry of Health and the Istituto Superiore di Sanita, in the Netherlands
  4. Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia [MCyT EET 2001/2216]
  5. Spanish Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo [DGVI 1312/04-1]
  6. Bundesamt fur Gesundheit, Bern [03.001297, 04.002363]
  7. Department of Health
  8. Scottish Home Office Department of Health
  9. Bundesministerium fur Gesundheit und Soziale Sicherung (BMGS) [GZ: 325-4471-02/15]
  10. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) [KZ: 0312720]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The 14-3-3 protein test has been shown to support the clinical diagnosis of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) when associated with an adequate clinical context, and a high differential potential for the diagnosis of sporadic CJD has been attributed to other cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteins such as tau protein, S100b and neuron specific enolase (NSE). So far there has been only limited information available about biochemical markers in genetic transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (gTSE), although they represent 10-15% of human TSEs. In this study, we analyzed CSF of 174 patients with gTSEs for 14-3-3 (n = 166), tau protein (n = 78), S100b (n = 46) and NSE (n = 50). Levels of brain-derived proteins in CSF varied in different forms of gTSE. Biomarkers were found positive in the majority of gCJD (81%) and insert gTSE (69%), while they were negative in most cases of fatal familial insomnia (13%) and Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker syndrome (10%). Disease duration and codon 129 genotype influence the findings in a different way than in sporadic CJD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据