4.7 Article

Development of classification models for early identification of persons at risk for persistent cognitive decline

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
卷 255, 期 10, 页码 1486-1494

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-008-0942-3

关键词

early identification; dementia; case-finding; cognitive decline; classification models

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To develop two classification models for use in primary care to aid early identification of persons at risk for persistent cognitive decline. Data were used from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA), an ongoing population-based study. The study sample consisted of 2,021 non-demented men and women aged 58-88 years. Data on relevant predictors of persistent cognitive decline were collected at baseline. The incidence of persistent cognitive decline after three years of follow-up was 4.0 %. In the first model, in which predictors already known or otherwise easily assessed (first set) were included, age was the strongest predictor of persistent cognitive decline, with an increased risk for persons > 75. In addition, having memory problems, low education, and a MMSE score of <= 24, resulted in a predictive value for persistent cognitive decline of 43.5 %. In the second classification model, in addition to the first set, predictors requiring additional measurement (e.g. markers determined in blood) were included in the analyses. Age was again the strongest predictor of persistent cognitive decline. In persons > 75 years, having a low total cholesterol level (< 5.0 mmol/L) and a MMSE score of <= 24 resulted in a predictive value of 30.0 %. Both models lead to a substantial increase of the predictive value for persistent cognitive decline, that is from 4.0 % to 43.5 % and 30.0 %, and may identify to a large extent a different subsample of persons who are at risk for persistent cognitive decline. The developed classification trees could be useful for case-finding of persons at risk for future persistent cognitive decline who are therefore at risk for dementia, in a feasible and cost-effective manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据