4.4 Article

Minimizing bleeding complications in spinal tumor surgery with preoperative Onyx embolization via dual-lumen balloon catheter

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 210-215

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011505

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Intraoperative bleeding is a significant risk in surgery for highly vascular spinal tumors, but preoperative embolization can safely decrease intraoperative blood loss in extrinsic spine tumors. Onyx, widely used for cerebrovascular embolization, has been increasingly used as an embolic agent for preoperative spinal tumor embolization. The Scepter catheter, a dual lumen balloon catheter, may improve tumor parenchymal penetration without the danger and limitations of significant embolic reflux. This may reduce bleeding risk during spinal surgery. Methods Eleven consecutive cases of preoperative Onyx embolization of extrinsic spinal tumors were identified, all of whom had subsequent spinal surgery. Demographic data and clinical variables were collected. Patients were divided into Scepter (n=6) and non Scepter (n=5) groups. The Mann Whitney U test was used to compare continuous outcome variables and the Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Results Estimated blood loss in the Scepter group was significantly lower than in the non-Scepter group (584 +/- 124 vs 2400 +/- 738 mL, p=0.004). The volume of intraoperative transfusion was also significantly lower (1.2 +/- 0.4 vs 5.8 +/- 1.7 units, p=0.004). There was no significant difference in the number of vessels embolized, vials of Onyx used, use of coiling adjunct, contrast load, radiation dose, or fluoroscopy time per pedicle (p>0.05). Conclusions The addition of the Scepter catheter to preoperative Onyx embolization is safe and feasible. In this small series, the Scepter catheter was associated with a reduction of intraoperative bleeding by 76% and a 79% lower transfusion volume. This was not accompanied by any unwanted increase in vials of Onyx used, contrast load, radiation dose, or fluoroscopy time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据