4.7 Article

Anti-inflammatory/anti-amyloidogenic effects of plasmalogens in lipopolysaccharide-induced neuroinflammation in adult mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROINFLAMMATION
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-197

关键词

Neuroinflammation; Phospholipids; Microglia; Alzheimer's disease

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [22590225]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22590225, 22590084] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Neuroinflammation involves the activation of glial cells in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). Plasmalogens (Pls) are glycerophospholipids constituting cellular membranes and play significant roles in membrane fluidity and cellular processes such as vesicular fusion and signal transduction. Methods: In this study the preventive effects of Pls on systemic lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced neuroinflammation were investigated using immunohistochemistry, real-time PCR methods and analysis of brain glycerophospholipid levels in adult mice. Results: Intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of LPS (250 mu g/kg) for seven days resulted in increases in the number of Iba-1-positive microglia and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-positive astrocytes in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampus accompanied by the enhanced expression of IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha mRNAs. In addition, beta-amyloid (A beta(3-16))-positive neurons appeared in the PFC and hippocampus of LPS- injected animals. The co-administration of Pls (i.p., 20 mg/kg) after daily LPS injections significantly attenuated both the activation of glial cells and the accumulation of A beta proteins. Finally, the amount of Pls in the PFC and hippocampus decreased following the LPS injections and this reduction was suppressed by co-treatment with Pls. Conclusions: These findings suggest that Pls have anti- neuroinflammatory and anti-amyloidogenic effects, thereby indicating the preventive or therapeutic application of Pls against AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据