4.3 Article

Aquaporin-4 water channel expression by thymoma of patients with and without myasthenia gravis

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROIMMUNOLOGY
卷 227, 期 1-2, 页码 178-184

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.07.016

关键词

Neuromyelitis optica; Aquaporin-4 water channel; Aquaporin-4 autoantibodies; Thymoma; Myasthenia gravis; Paraneoplastic neurological disorders

资金

  1. Faculty of Medicine of the University of Hong Kong

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a serious idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating disorder characterized by acute transverse myelitis and optic neuritis. A significant proportion of NMO patients are seropositive for NMO-IgG, an autoantibody targeting aquaporin-4 (AQP4) water channel. Paraneoplastic NMO associated various tumors were recently reported. Aim: We studied the expression of AQP4 by thymoma from patients with and without myasthenia gravis (MG). Methods: Thymoma obtained from thymomectomy in patients with and without MG were studied by immunohistochemistry and western blot. Results: Ten thymoma patients (9 with MG) and two control patients without thymoma or MG were studied. Immunohistochemistry revealed AQP4 immunoreactivity in cell membrane of thymoma cells from all ten thymoma specimens whereas thymic tissues from patients without thymoma or MG were negative for AQP4 immunoreactivity. Western blot revealed that lysates of nine of the ten thymoma specimens reacted with antihuman AQP4 antibody with a band of similar to 30 kDa compatible with the molecular weight of AQP4. Interestingly, immunofluorescence revealed that IgG isolated from 2 NMO patients seropositive for NMO-IgG bound to cell membrane of thymoma cells from all ten thymoma specimens while IgG from healthy control subject did not. Conclusion: Thymoma cells of patients with and without MG express AQP4. AQP4 autoantibodies from serum of NMO patients bound to AQP4 expressed on thymoma cell membrane. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据