4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

Nicotine Dependence Pharmacogenetics: Role of Genetic Variation in Nicotine-Metabolizing Enzymes

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROGENETICS
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 252-261

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01677060802572887

关键词

tobacco; nicotine; addiction; genetics; pharmacogenetics

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P50CA084718] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [U01DA020830] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCI NIH HHS [P50 CA084718] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDA NIH HHS [U01 DA020830] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nicotine-dependence pharmacogenetics research is an emerging field, and a number of studies have begun to characterize the clinical relevance and predictive power of genetic variation in drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug target genes for response to medication. The present paper focuses on evidence for the role of nicotine-metabolizing enzymes in smoking behavior and response to treatment. Nicotine metabolism is mediated primarily by cytochrome P450 2A6 (CYP2A6). Genetic variation in the CYP2A6 gene has been linked with several smoking behavior phenotypes. Individuals who carry null or reduced activity alleles for CYP2A6 smoke fewer cigarettes per day, are less dependent on nicotine, and may have an easier time quitting smoking. A phenotypic measure of CYP2A6 enzyme activity, defined as the ratio of the nicotine metabolites 3'hydroxycotinine/cotinine, also predicts successful quitting with the transdermal nicotine patch, and counseling alone. Faster metabolizers of nicotine respond more poorly to these treatments; however, they may be excellent candidates for non-nicotine therapies, such as bupropion. Inherited variation in the CYP2B6 enzyme is also associated with response to bupropion treatment and counseling alone for smoking cessation. Inhibition of the CYP2A6 enzyme to slow nicotine metabolism is a promising approach to increase nicotine availability and potentially reduce harm from tobacco smoking.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据