4.2 Article

Increased Vesicular γ-GABA Transporter and Decreased Phosphorylation of Synapsin I in the Rostral Preoptic Area is Associated with Decreased Gonadotrophin-Releasing Hormone and c-Fos Coexpression in Middle-Aged Female Mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 753-761

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jne.12050

关键词

ageing; GnRH; VGAT; VGLUT2; synapsin I

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [20070392004]
  2. Fujian Provincial Department of Education Project [JK2010025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypothalamic glutamate (Glu) and -GABA neurotransmission are involved in the ovarian hormone-induced gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)/luteinising hormone (LH) surge in rodents. Studies have shown that reduced Glu and increased -GABA in the rostral preoptic area (rPOA) of the hypothalamus, where most activated GnRH neurones are located, play a key role in decreasing the reproductive function of female rats. However, the mechanism underlying the altered balance of these neurotransmitters is poorly understood. In the present study, we observed a decline in the function of GnRH neurones in the rPOA at the time of the GnRH/LH surge in middle-aged intact female mice with regular oestrous cycles. In young mice, there is an increase of vesicular Glu transporter 2 on the pro-oestrus afternoon, which is not observed in middle-aged mice. By contrast, vesicular -GABA transporter levels in young mice decrease at the time of the LH surge, whereas they increase in middle-aged mice. Of note, we found that, in middle-aged mice at the time of the GnRH/LH surge, the phosphorylation of synapsin I at Ser603 and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II was significantly lower than in young mice. These data suggest that, in middle-aged mice, higher levels of presynaptic stores of GABA, a lack of increase of Glu and a decreased ability of synaptic vesicle mobilisation could account for the imbalance of Glu and GABA in the rPOA, which decreases the activation of GnRH neurones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据