4.2 Article

Neonatal Programming by Neuroimmune Challenge: Effects on Responses and Tolerance to Septic Doses of Lipopolysaccharide in Adult Male and Female Rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 272-281

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2010.01967.x

关键词

HPA axis; lipopolysaccharide; sickness behaviour; temperature; thermoregulation

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  2. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR)
  3. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
  4. Canadian Stroke Network
  5. AstraZeneca Canada Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A mild immune challenge experienced during the neonatal period leads to attenuated febrile responses to a similar challenge experienced later in life. However, the immune response to an endotoxin differs depending upon the severity of the challenge and it is not clear whether a neonatal immune challenge will also affect responses to a severe, potentially life-threatening stimulus, such as sepsis. In the present study, we examined the effects of a neonatal immune challenge with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on adult sickness responses, as well as the development of endotoxin tolerance, to a septic dose (1 or 3 mg/kg) of the same LPS in male and female rats. We demonstrate significant differences, particularly in males, in the fever profiles of neonatally LPS-treated rats compared to neonatally saline-treated controls. Specifically, male rats treated neonatally with LPS have reduced hypothermic and enhanced hyperthermic responses to both septic doses of LPS in adulthood. A somewhat different profile is seen in females, with neonatally LPS-treated females having reduced hypothermia and enhanced hyperthermia compared to controls with 1 mg/kg but no differences with 3 mg/kg LPS. The results obtained demonstrate that alterations in innate immune responses previously reported for low doses of LPS can, for the most part, also be observed after severe immune challenge in later life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据