4.5 Article

Developmental abnormalities of cortical interneurons precede symptoms onset in a mouse model of Rett syndrome

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 131, 期 1, 页码 115-127

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jnc.12803

关键词

calretinin; GABAergic interneurons; Mecp2; neocortex; parvalbumin; Rett syndrome

资金

  1. International Rett Syndrome Foundation (USA)
  2. Telethon Foundation-Italy [GGP09196, GGP11095]
  3. AIRETT-Italy
  4. University of Torino-Fondazione SanPaolo (Progetti di Ricerca di Ateneo)
  5. Regime Piemonte [POS FESR 07/13 BANP]
  6. Albero di Greta ONLUS Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rett syndrome (RTT, MIM312750), a neurodevelopmental disorder predominantly occurring in females, is caused in the majority of cases by sporadic mutations in the gene encoding the transcriptional modulator methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2). In mice, impaired MeCP2 function results in severe motor, cognitive, and emotional defects. The lack of Mecp2 in -aminobutyric acid-(GABA) releasing forebrain interneurons (INs) recapitulate many RTT features, however, the role of this gene in the development of the cortical inhibitory system is still unknown. Here, we found that MeCP2 expression varies among the three major classes of cortical INs and its nuclear localization differs between neuronal types. The density of calretinin(+) and parvalbumin(+) INs increases in Mecp2 knockout mice (Mecp2(-/y)) already at early post-natal developmental stages. In contrast, the density of somatostatin(+) INs is not affected. We also found that the development of multipolar-calretinin(+) INs is selectively affected by the absence of Mecp2. Additionally, we show that in Mecp2 heterozygous female mice, a model closely mimicking human RTT condition, IN abnormalities are similar to those observed in Mecp2(-/y) mice. Together, our study indicates that loss of function of Mecp2 strongly interferes with the correct establishment of the neocortical inhibitory system producing effects that are specific to different IN subtypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据