4.5 Article

Therapeutic inducers of the HSP70/HSP110 protect mice against traumatic brain injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 130, 期 5, 页码 626-641

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jnc.12781

关键词

BGP-15; celastrol; closed cortical impact; Hsp110; Hsp70; knockout mice

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA132640, R01 CA121951, CA121951, R01 CA062130, CA132640, CA062130] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS065172, NS065172] Funding Source: Medline
  3. BLRD VA [I01 BX000161] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) induces severe harm and disability in many accident victims and combat-related activities. The heat-shock proteins Hsp70/Hsp110 protect cells against death and ischemic damage. In this study, we used mice deficient in Hsp110 or Hsp70 to examine their potential requirement following TBI. Data indicate that loss of Hsp110 or Hsp70 increases brain injury and death of neurons. One of the mechanisms underlying the increased cell death observed in the absence of Hsp110 and Hsp70 following TBI is the increased expression of reactive oxygen species-induced p53 target genes Pig1, Pig8, and Pig12. To examine whether drugs that increase the levels of Hsp70/Hsp110 can protect cells against TBI, we subjected mice to TBI and administered Celastrol or BGP-15. In contrast to Hsp110- or Hsp70i-deficient mice that were not protected following TBI and Celastrol treatment, there was a significant improvement of wild-type mice following administration of these drugs during the first week following TBI. In addition, assessment of neurological injury shows significant improvement in contextual and cued fear conditioning tests and beam balance in wild- type mice that were treated with Celastrol or BGP-15 following TBI compared to TBI-treated mice. These studies indicate a significant role of Hsp70/Hsp110 in neuronal survival following TBI and the beneficial effects of Hsp70/Hsp110 inducers toward reducing the pathological consequences of TBI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据