4.5 Review

Clinical features of Friedreich's ataxia: classical and atypical phenotypes

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 103-117

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jnc.12317

关键词

autosomal recessive; clinical features; Friedreich's ataxia

资金

  1. European Commission [HEALTH-F2-2010-242193]
  2. Department of Health's National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme
  3. Dementias and Neurodegenerative Diseases Research Network (DeNDRoN)
  4. l'Associazione Italiana per la lotta alle Sindromi Atassiche (AISA)
  5. Ataxia UK
  6. Ataxia Ireland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One hundred and fifty years since Nikolaus Friedreich's first description of the degenerative ataxic syndrome which bears his name, his description remains at the core of the classical clinical phenotype of gait and limb ataxia, poor balance and coordination, leg weakness, sensory loss, areflexia, impaired walking, dysarthria, dysphagia, eye movement abnormalities, scoliosis, foot deformities, cardiomyopathy and diabetes. Onset is typically around puberty with slow progression and shortened life-span often related to cardiac complications. Inheritance is autosomal recessive with the vast majority of cases showing an unstable intronic GAA expansion in both alleles of the frataxin gene on chromosome 9q13. A small number of cases are caused by a compound heterozygous expansion with a point mutation or deletion. Understanding of the underlying molecular biology has enabled identification of atypical phenotypes with late onset, or atypical features such as retained reflexes. Late-onset cases tend to have slower progression and are associated with smaller GAA expansions. Early-onset cases tend to have more rapid progression and a higher frequency of non-neurological features such as diabetes, cardiomyopathy, scoliosis and pes cavus. Compound heterozygotes, including those with large deletions, often have atypical features. In this paper, we review the classical and atypical clinical phenotypes of Friedreich's ataxia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据