4.5 Article

Aβ40 modulated GABAA receptor α6 subunit expression and rat cerebellar granule neuron maturation through the ERK/mTOR pathway

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 128, 期 3, 页码 350-362

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jnc.12471

关键词

APP(-/-) mice; A beta 40; ERK/mTOR pathway cerebellar granule neurons; GABA(A)6 subunit; p75(NTR)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 31070745]
  2. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In addition to their neurotoxic role in Alzheimer's disease (AD), -amyloid peptides (As) are also known to play physiological roles. Here, we show that recombinant A40 significantly increased the outward current of the GABA(A) receptor containing (GABA(A)6) in rat cerebellar granule neurons (CGNs). The A40-mediated increase in GABA(A)6 current was mediated by an increase in GABA(A)6 protein expression at the translational rather than the transcriptional level. The exposure of CGNs to A40 markedly induced the phosphorylation of ERK (pERK) and mammalian target of rapamycin (pmTOR). The increase in GABA(A)6 current and expression was attenuated by specific inhibitors of ERK or mTOR, suggesting that the ERK and mTOR signaling pathways are required for the effect of A40 on GABA(A)6 current and expression in CGNs. A pharmacological blockade of the p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75(NTR)), but not the insulin or 7-nAChR receptors, abrogated the effect of A40 on GABA(A)6 protein expression and current. Furthermore, the expression of GABA(A)6 was lower in CGNs from APP(-/-) mice than in CGNs from wild-type mice. Moreover, the internal granule layer (IGL) in APP(-/-) mice was thinner than the IGL in wild-type mice. The injection of A40 into the cerebellum reversed this effect, and the application of p75(NTR) blocking antibody abolished the effects of A40 on cerebellum morphology in APP(-/-) mice. Our results suggest that low concentrations of A40 play a role in regulating CGN maturation through p75(NTR).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据