4.5 Article

Genetic inactivation of the adenosine A2A receptor exacerbates brain damage in mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 123, 期 1, 页码 100-112

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07807.x

关键词

adenosine A1 receptors; adenosine A2A receptors; CD4+T cells; experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE); microglial cells; multiple sclerosis

资金

  1. Wenzhou Medical College Key Research Project [30328015]
  2. Joint Found of China Ministry of Public Health-Zhejiang Bureau of Health [WKJ 2005-2-041]
  3. Wenzhou Science &Technology bureau [H20100014]
  4. Building Funding of Zhejiang Key Subject (Pharmacology and Biochemical Pharmaceutics)
  5. US public health grant [(NIH) NS41083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies with multiple sclerosis patients and animal models of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) implicate adenosine and adenosine receptors in modulation of neuroinflammation and brain injury. Although the involvement of the A1 receptor has been recently demonstrated, the role of the adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) in development of EAE pathology is largely unknown. Using mice with genetic inactivation of the A2A receptor, we provide direct evidence that loss of the A2AR exacerbates EAE pathology in mice. Compared with wild-type mice, A2AR knockout mice injected with myelin oligodendroglia glycoprotein peptide had a higher incidence of EAE and exhibited higher neurological deficit scores and greater decrease in body weight. A2AR knockout mice displayed increased inflammatory cell infiltration and enhanced microglial cell activation in cortex, brainstem, and spinal cord. In addition, demyelination and axonal damage in brainstem were exacerbated, levels of Th1 cytokines increased, and Th2 cytokines decreased. Collectively, these findings suggest that extracellular adenosine acting at A2ARs triggers an important neuroprotective mechanism. Thus, the A2A receptor is a potential target for therapeutic approaches to multiple sclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据